Executive Summary
- Last month we viewed the Fed’s decision to begin its rate-cutting cycle with a more aggressive 50 basis point reduction instead of 25 basis points as a positive. This larger cut helped alleviate concerns about weakening economic conditions.
- However, following the cut, stronger than expected economic reports emerged, casting doubt on whether a larger rate reduction was necessary. Since the rate cut, long-term bond yields have risen. It’s unclear if this rise was due solely to fears that the Fed went too far or concerns about the upcoming election – maybe both.
- We have maintained a slight equity and home bias in our tactical positioning. We do have an important election in front of us and its outcome and new congressional makeup could prompt changes in our positioning.
Fixed Income
Weight: Slight Underweight
Last month, we suggested that much of the yield curve seemed to expect faster rate cuts than the Fed might deliver. Since then, apart from the shortest maturities, yields have moved to more reasonable levels, given our economic and inflation expectations
U.S. Taxable Investment Grade
Weight: Slight Underweight
Last month we added to our underweight to fund an increase in small-cap equities. Our decision was not due to concerns with investment-grade bonds, but rather the belief that there are greater return
Duration
Weight: Neutral
Following the Fed’s rate cut, we removed our slight duration overweight. While longer-term rates have increased, we now view the risks of rates moving either higher or lower from this point as relatively balanced.
U.S. Taxable Non-Investment Grade
Weight: Slight Overweight
High-yield bonds have performed well despite higher interest rates, thanks to economic resilience, a lower maturity wall, and higher index quality. We believe the Fed’s easing cycle will incent investors to move into higher-yielding securities.
Equities
Weight: Slight Overweight
Although there are pockets of weakness, the overall economy remains strong. With the Fed now easing, we have become slightly more attracted to domestic equities, particularly those that are undervalued and more likely to benefit from lower interest rates.
U.S. Large Cap
Weight: Neutral
Second-half earnings comparisons should remain favorable, leading to continued earnings beats. However, the 2025 earnings outlook may be more challenging. For large-cap stocks, AI spending is expected to play a crucial role in sustaining earnings growth.
Growth
Weight: Moderate Underweight
We remain underweight Growth equities due to the high idiosyncratic risk among its top constituents and their elevated valuations. The Russell 1000 Growth Index trades at 28x estimated 2025 EPS, compared to 21x for the S&P 500 and 17x the S&P 500 equal weighted index.
Value
Weight: Slight Overweight
Value stocks have trailed the broad index, but it has not been due to style-specific issues. A few exceptionally large names continue to drive market returns, and they happen to be Growth stocks. Excluding these, the Value index has performed in line with the broader market.
U.S. Mid Cap
Weight: Modest Overweight
Mid caps have generated solid returns with the S&P 400 Index up over 14% year-to-date through October 28. However, these gains have been driven mainly by multiple expansion, with earnings lagging. We are maintaining our overweight position, anticipating higher earnings growth in 2025 and beyond.
U.S. Small Cap
Weight: Slight Overweight
The Fed’s dovish rate cut prompted us to assess which asset class would benefit the most from lower interest rates. Small caps topped the list. They have been hit hardest by rising rates and are now attractively valued, making them well-positioned to benefit from easing.
International Developed
Weight: Slight Underweight
In Europe, we had expected to see green shoots by now, but instead, economic weakness continues, and earnings estimates are being revised downward. While China’s recent stimulus measures may offer some relief, we are maintaining our slight underweight.
International Emerging
Weight: Neutral
The combination of the Fed’s 50bps cut and China’s increased stimulus efforts has improved the prospects for emerging markets. However, we plan to stay neutral for now, awaiting election results, given the potential risk of new tariffs.
Strategic: Strategic asset allocation is a baseline allocation between asset classes established with a longer term focus and congruent with an investor’s investment goals and objectives. The allocation is meant to optimize the asset mix through methodical diversification in an attempt to maximize return and lessen risk.
Tactical: Tactical asset allocation is differentiated from strategic asset allocation by having a much shorter time horizon and the goal of adding alpha beyond what would be allowed through static strategic weights. Markets tend to be more volatile over shorter time horizons, while longer time frames tend to smooth out that volatility. That enhanced volatility in the short term creates the opportunity for either return enhancement and/or risk reduction by adding to or reducing weights of different asset classes.