Executive Summary
- The Fed has kicked off its rate-cutting cycle with a bit of a bang, choosing to lower the Funds rate by 50 instead of 25 basis points. Chair Powell’s message was that they acted out of opportunity as opposed to necessity.
- We view this rate cut positively, as it eases our concerns about weakening economic conditions. Additionally, our analysis of easing cycles show that stocks tend to rise in the 12 months following the first rate cut.
- China also made a surprising stimulus announcement, with suggestions of more to follow. That means the two largest economies in the world are becoming more market friendly. In response, we tactically shifted to an equity overweight position.
Fixed Income
Weight: Slight Underweight
The yield curve has started to un-invert, due to falling shorter-term rates. While we remain favorable toward fixed income, we believe much of the curve is anticipating a faster pace of rate cuts than the Fed may deliver.
U.S. Taxable Investment Grade
Weight: Slight Underweight
We added to our underweight to fund an increase in small cap equities. Our decision is not due to concerns with investment grade bonds, but rather the belief that there are greater return opportunities elsewhere.
Duration
Weight: Neutral
Following the Fed’s rate cut, we removed our slight duration overweight. We see the rate cut as dovish, which is likely to keep long-term yields pinned unless the economy were to weaken considerably, something we do not currently forecast
U.S. Taxable Non-Investment Grade
Weight: Slight Overweight
High yield bonds have performed well despite higher interest rates, thanks to economic resilience, a lower maturity wall, and higher index quality. We believe the Fed’s easing cycle will incent investors to move cash holdings into higher yielding securities.
Equities
Weight: Slight Overweight
Although there are pockets of weakness, the overall economy remains strong. With the Fed now easing, we have become slightly more attracted to domestic equities, particularly those that are undervalued and more likely to benefit from lower interest rates.
U.S. Large Cap
Weight: Neutral
Second-half earnings comparisons are relatively easy, suggesting continued earnings beats, though 2025 earnings comparisons become more difficult. For large cap stocks, AI spending will continue to play a crucial role in earnings growth.
Growth
Weight: Moderate Underweight
We remain underweight Growth equities due to the high idiosyncratic risk among its top constituents and its high valuations. The Russell 1000 Growth Index trades at 27x estimated 2025 EPS, compared to 21x for the S&P 500 and 16x the S&P 500 equal weighted index.
Value
Weight: Slight Overweight
While our shift toward Value has not worked yet, it has not been due to style specific issues. A few exceptionally large names have driven market returns, and they happen to be Growth stocks. Excluding these, the Value index has performed in line with the broader market.
U.S. Mid Cap
Weight: Modest Overweight
Mid caps have provided healthy returns with the S&P 400 Index up over 13% year-to-date through September 25. However, these gains have been largely driven by multiple expansion, with earnings lagging. We are maintaining our overweight position due to the potential for higher earnings growth in 2025 and beyond.
U.S. Small Cap
Weight: Slight Overweight
The Fed’s dovish rate cut prompted us to assess which asset class could benefit the most from lower interest rates, and small caps were at the top of our list. Small caps have been the most negatively impacted by higher rates, and have low valuations, making them well-positioned to benefit from easing.
International Developed
Weight: Slight Underweight
In Europe, we had expected to see green shoots by now, but instead, signs of economic weakness continue, and earnings estimates are being revised down. While China’s recent stimulus announcement may provide some relief, we are maintaining our slight underweight
International Emerging
Weight: Neutral
The combination of the Fed’s 50bp cut and China’s increased stimulus efforts have improved the prospects for emerging markets. However, we plan to maintain our neutral position as we await election results given the potential risk of new tariff threats.
Strategic: Strategic asset allocation is a baseline allocation between asset classes established with a longer term focus and congruent with an investor’s investment goals and objectives. The allocation is meant to optimize the asset mix through methodical diversification in an attempt to maximize return and lessen risk.
Tactical: Tactical asset allocation is differentiated from strategic asset allocation by having a much shorter time horizon and the goal of adding alpha beyond what would be allowed through static strategic weights. Markets tend to be more volatile over shorter time horizons, while longer time frames tend to smooth out that volatility. That enhanced volatility in the short term creates the opportunity for either return enhancement and/or risk reduction by adding to or reducing weights of different asset classes.